Why was Japan’s goal valid
FIFA have confirmed that Japan's controversial winning goal against Spain was valid as the whole ball didn't go out of play in the build-up. Ao Tanaka's strike was initially disallowed, as the ball appeared to have crossed the byline before Kaoru Mitoma pulled a cross back into the box.
Was Japan second goal correct
FIFA has confirmed Japan's controversial winning goal against Spain on Thursday was correctly awarded. Japan came from a goal down to beat Spain 2-1, with the victory being secured by Ao Tanaka, who turned in Kaoru Mitoma's cut-back despite the ball initially appearing to have gone out of play.
Was Japan’s second goal legit
VAR overturn: Ball in play for Tanaka goal
What happened: Japan thought they had scored a second goal in the 51st minute when Ao Tanaka scored as Kaoru Mitoma cut the ball back from the goal-line, but the referee disallowed the goal for the ball being out of play. VAR decision: Goal, ball in play.
Why was Japan’s second goal not out
The camera on the goal line did indeed suggest there was a sliver of the ball which was right over the line. This would be enough for VAR to overturn the goal. An hour later, The Associated Press released a still which seemed to indicate that a part of the ball hung over the touchline.
Why was Japan’s goal not disallowed
It all comes down to the curvature of the ball, plain and simple. The law states the ball remains in play "if the curvature of the ball is over the line".
How did Japan get the second goal against Spain
Referee Victor Miguel de Freitas Gomes was recommended to carry out a VAR check, and after listening to his earpiece, but not checking the monitor, awarded the goal. The goal line technology system only applies to the goal line itself.
Was Japan second goal legal
Explained: Why Japan's second goal against Spain was controversially allowed by VAR despite ball appearing to be out of play. Japan's second goal against Spain, scored by Ao Tanaka, was allowed to stand after a lengthy VAR check – here's why.
Was Japan’s second goal wrong
Why did VAR rule the decision in Japan's favour It has to be understood that even though the ball might have been placed on ground beyond the touchline, it's tangent was inside the permissible limit. Hence, a part of the ball was in-line with the touchline, prompting the officials to call it a legitimate goal.
Was Japan’s second goal real
After what seemed like an eternity, the VAR made its decision, saying the ball had, in fact, not gone out of play, and awarding a goal to Japan. The decision was met with immediate outrage from fans.
